The hypoechoic lesion – Solid breast nodule
Benign or malignant ultrasound characteristics of Solid Breast Nodules
Ultrasound is a useful diagnostic tool for breast cancer. Breast ultrasound is used to distinguish solid from cystic masses. Is it a hypoechoic nodule, (explained below)? Is a lesion a mass?
For young women (younger than 30) ultrasound imaging will often be the first scan, after a clinical exam feels either a palpable mass or nipple discharge.
Since breast cancer tends to happen with older post-menopausal women, doctors try not to expose younger women to the unnecessary radiation of a mammogram.
Sonography means Ultrasound, and it can help establish the difference between benign and malignant solid tumors.
Sonogram / Ultrasound scan, can find out if a nodule on a mammogram, is a solid nodule, or a cyst.
Hypoechoic nodule or solid lesion in a breast
Suppose an ultrasound report said there is a hypoechoic nodule, or a hypoechoic lesion in a breast, perhaps also saying it is solid. What do these words mean?
Hypoechoic means it looks darker on ultrasound than the surrounding tissue. The surrounding tissue therefore looks brighter/lighter shades of grey. Does hypoechoic mean cancer? No.
Hypoechoic means it is solid, not liquid. That’s basically all the word means, that it’s not a cyst.
Lesion, is also a word that means simply “some thing that we are currently talking about”. Lets give some examples of using the word lesion in a sentence:
- You scraped your knee. The doctor says, does that skin lesion hurt?
- You have a wart on your toe. The doctors says, I’ll put some liquid nitrogen on that lesion.
- Your facebook picture has a lesion on your forehead. You say, it’s a shadow of a frisbee that hit me 1 second later.
On the topic of a nodule, if it is solid, Ultrasound helps, to look at it’s characteristics. A lack of circumscribed margins, heterogeneous echo patterns, and an increased anteroposterior dimension can indicate a higher probability of malignancy in solid breast nodules.
Ultrasound studies will carefully examine margins, shape, and echogenicity
The most important features on a breast ultrasound are the smoothness and contour of the mass margins, and the shape of the mass.
The echo texture and echogenicity, and the effects on distal echoes.
Others aspects of the mass such as compress-ability and vascularity may also be noted.
Some of the features one might find in a ultrasound of a malignant breast mass would include:
- a marked hypoechogenecity,
- acoustic shadowing,
- a branch pattern
- or microlobulation,
- or a duct extension.
- a ‘taller than wide’ shape,
- angular margins,
- the presence of microcalcifications,
- and spiculation, which probably has the highest positive predictive value for malignant breast cancer.
Benign breast lesions on the other hand tend to appear on ultrasound with:
- intense and uniform hyperechogenicity,
- as an oval shape with a thin, consistent capsule,
- and they may have two to three gentle lobulations.
Summary of sonographic features of benign and malignant solid breast nodules
A breast ultrasound can help in diagnosis in differentiating between benign and malignant tumors, often without the need for a biopsy. The absence of a well-circumscribed margin, heterogenous echo patterns, as well as an increased anteroposterior dimension to the image does tend to indicate a higher probability of malignant cancer in solid breast nodules. A BI-RADS classification of 3, which means ‘probably benign’ and with recommended short term follow up only, can only be given if there is an absence of any of these clearly suspicious features.
|Sonographic characteristics||Benign||Potentially Malignant|
|Absence of malignant findings||x|
|Hyperechoic/ intense, fibrous tissue like||x|
|Two or three macrolobulations||x|
|Ellipsoid shape/ wider than tall, parallel to the skin||x|
|Pseudocapsule/ thin, echogenic, well-circumscribed||x|
|Spiculations/ alternating hyper and hypoechoic straight lines||x|
|Height/ width >1 or non parallel to the skin||x|
|Shadowing/ through transmission attenuated||x|
|Branch pattern extensions / multiple radial projections, peri or intra-ductal, nipple oriented||x|
|Markedly hypoechoic ..||x|
|Duct extension / single radial projection, peri or intra-ductal, nipple oriented||x|
|Intracystic nodule*, parietal thickening*||x|
Ultrasound characteristics typical of malignant breast masses
The most typical sonographic presentation of a malignant breast mass would probably be an irregular, heterogeneous, hypoechoic mass, with spiculations and angular margins.
Malignant masses tend to have that ‘taller-than-wide’ appearance,
OK, let me digress and explain taller-than-wide. Something that isn’t cancer, is going to be soft, bendy, squishy, slow-growing, and “polite” to its neighbors. What I mean by polite-ness, is that it’s not going to force itself through barriers, not going to invade into other tissues. Benign things “go with the flow”. What is the “flow” in a breast? What is the normal orientation of things, the normal way things lie when relaxed? 2 answers: 1) some things flow toward the nipple, like how ducts converge behind the nipple. 2) some things like the fat in the breast, flatten and spread out due to gravity while lying down, like FAT LOBULES. Things you see on ultrasound that tend to spread out in the same direction as fat, are probably not cancer.
On the other hand, cancers grow fast and they have internal pressure to expand outward. That is a force that lets cancers grow in directions that aren’t aligned to ducts or fat. Thinking about cancer this way,is much smarter than taller-than-wide.
Malignant masses can show posterior acoustic shadowing on ultrasound images. The image below shows an ill-defined border, an irregular shape, microlobulations, and spiculations. The lesion also appears to be ‘taller-than-wide’, with an angular margin. This would all be highly predictive of invasive ductal carcinoma, and the lesions would be biopsied.
Suggestive of malignancy: spiculations, angular margins, hypoechoic, taller-than-wide
Spiculations often represent breast tumor ‘tentacles’ or desmoplastic reactions. On ultrasound, spiculations will often consist of straight lines that ‘radiate’ in a perpendicular fashion from the surface of the breast mass.
An ‘angular margin‘ is observed as an angular configuration of the junction between relatively hypoechoic or isoechoic central portion of a solid mass and surrounding tissue. Sometimes these features are referred to as ‘jagged’ or ‘irregular’ margins. Angular margins are quite distinct from ‘lobulations’ which tend to be smooth and rounded. Angular margins observed on breast ultrasound are highly predictive of malignancy.
If a solid breast nodule appears on ultrasound to be ‘taller-than-wide‘, this is apparently suspicious of malignancy. The textbook may say: when a patient is scanned by ultrasound, they are usually in a supine position, and as a result the normal ’tissue planes’ on the breast will have a horizontal orientation. If a mass or part of the mass seems longer in the anteroposterior dimension (tallness) compared to either the sagittal or transverse dimensions (depth and width) then one can conceive that this might likely be caused by a malignancy ‘aggressive enough’ to overcome normal breast tissue barriers and planes, and grow vertically.
Hypoechoic breast lesions are suspicious for malignancy, and on ultrasound imaging they will tend to look more dark compared to the surrounding isoechoic fat. But malignancies can also be isoechoic and hyperechoic on breast ultrasound, so it is not a rigid rule by any means.
Microlobulations, duct extensions, and posterior acoustic shadowing are also suspicious for breast cancer
‘Microlobulations‘ observed on breast ultrasound indicate the presence of lots of very small (1mm to 2 mm) lobulations on the surface of a solid breast nodule, and will be quite similar to mammogram findings. As the number of these microlobulations increase, the probability that the breast mass is malignant also increases.
A ‘duct extension‘ is appears on ultrasound as a ‘radially oriented’ projection that seems to arise from the lesions an axis oriented towards the nipple. These projections are often observed both within or around breast duct. Sometimes a duct extensions/projection can be observed which has developed as a ‘bridge’ between multifocal malignancies. This is different from a ‘branch pattern’ in which multiple extensions are seen to arise from the mass but extend away-from the nipple. A branching pattern tends to indicate a tumor growth advancing away from the nipple. Any apparent growth that is long enough to visibly fill a duct and branch, no matter what direction is goes, will be suspicious for malignancy and be biopsied.
If a breast lesion shows posterior acoustic shadowing on ultrasound this means that there is something about the mass or around the mass which attenuates (reduces) the sonic beam strength when compared to normal adjacent tissues. Posterior acoustic shadowing is suspicious for malignancy, but tends to be associated with low to intermediate grade breast tumors. What may be happening is that a slow growing breast tumor causes a secondary ‘desmoplastic response’ in the surrounding tissue. That means that dense fibrous and connective tissues are growing around the tumor as a kind of defense mechanism by the body; to ‘contain’ the neoplastic growth. High grade malignancies in the breast grow too fast for this desmoplastic reaction to occur. However, posterior acoustic shadowing caused by a desmoplastic reaction can be found in benign breast neoplasms as well. For example, fibrosis inside a tumor can block ultrasound from passing deeper, causing acoustic shadowing. But most benign tumors do not usually shadow unless they are calcified. A biopsy will likely be required.
Calcifications on breast ultrasound are also suspicious for malignancy
Mammography is more sensitive than ultrasound when it comes to the detection of microcalcifications. Calcifications on a solid mass which appear ‘punctate’ are highly suspicious of malignancy, and will usually appear on ultrasound as bright, punctate foci. Since malignant breast lesions are typically either intensely or mildly homogeneous hypoechoic solid masses, on ultrasound this provides a ‘background’ which makes it easier to view calcifications sonographically. So, while calcifications are usually not seen on ultrasound, when they do appear vividly, it is highly suspicious for malignancy.
Spiculations and irregular borders have the highest positive predictive value for breast cancer
In terms of the suggested ‘BI-RADS’ descriptors for malignant breast nodules, spiculated margins have a positive predictive value for malignant breast cancer in about the 85% range. Masses showing an irregular shape or non-parallel orientation are also quite suggestive of malignancy, with a positive predictive value in the 62% to 69% range. Other studies place a higher predictive value on the presence of an irregular border (about 88% predictive of malignancy) and evidence of increased vascularity in the mass predicts malignancy about 82% of the time. The ultrasound image below shows an irregular vascularized retroareolar mass, with calcifications. This is very likely to be infiltrating ductal carcinoma and a biopsy sample would likely be taken right away.
On ultrasound, a benign breast mass will typically be well defined and with smooth margins. The lesion might also be macrolobulated or with just 2 to 4 mild lobulations. Benign breast lesions also tend to be ovoid or round in shape, and are often ‘wider-than-tall’ (which indicates a parallel orientation to the chest wall). The echo texture of a benign mass will usually be homogeneous with an isoechoic, hyperechoic, to mildly hypoechoic echogenicity. Some benign breast masses will also exhibit mild acoustic enhancement on ultrasound, and might be slightly compressible. Vascularity in an ultrasound of a benign mass is variable and will depend on the specific histology of the suspicious mass.
In terms of sonographic features suggestive of benign breast lesions, a well circumscribed margin has a positive predictive value for being benign about 90% of the time, and an ‘oval shape’ about 84% of the time. Breast lesions with a ‘parallel’ orientation are predictive of benignity almost 80% of the time.
The quality of the margins of a breast lesions scanned with ultrasound are is sometimes referred to as its ‘capsule’. If the margin of the suspected mass seems well-circumscribed in both it’s inner and outer edges, and seems thin and even, this tends to be a sign of a benign mass. The lesion is ‘encapsulated’ by the compressed adjacent breast tissue, and the mass itself is ‘pushing against’ this tissue, rather than infiltrating and invading that tissue.
Sometimes you do see a mild undulation in contour on ultrasound with a benign fibroadenoma. But there should not be many of these mild ‘lobulations’, and usually any more than three is considered a potentially malignant sign. Of greater concern are more numerous, smaller, and sharper microlobulations than one tends to find in malignant breast cancer tumors.
Breast lesions which appear as having a marked and uniform hyperechogenicity are highly predictive of a benign lesion. This feature typically represents normal fibrous changes within the breast. But when there are some regions are either hyperechogenicity or iso-echogenicity that are larger than normal (larger than either normal ducts or terminal ductal-lobular units) , that would indicate a ‘medium’ level of concern and would probably result in a biopsy, particularly if these areas were not contained within fat lobules.
The ‘compressibility’ of a breast lesions scanned with ultrasound refers to changes in the shape of a lesion as a result of the pressure applied by the probe. A solid, likely malignant, breast lesion will not ‘compress’ at all from the pressure of the probe, but a tumor of benign fibrous or glandular tissue, such as a fibroadenoma, will show some compressibility. A benign breast fibroadenoma is usually oriented horizontally, more wide than tall. Often the compression of the scanner will cause a ‘flattened’ oval shape of a fibroadenoma, which would not occur with solid, malignant breast lesions.
Breast ultrasound sometimes detects abnormal axillary lymph nodes
Sometimes a breast ultrasound will pick up an enlarged node in axilla. Many breast cancer oncologists would take an enlarged axillary node on ultrasound as proof positive for lymph node metastasis, even without a lymph node dissection. (Sometimes patients will not agree to a lymph node dissection to check for breast cancer metastasis)
The ‘odds ratio’ of potentially malignant sonographic features is highest for lack of a well-circumscribed margin
If the findings of ultrasound imaging of suspicious breast nodules where expressed as an odds ratio ( the odds of a person with these features as having breast cancer, as compared to an breast ultrasound where these features are not present) it may be suggested that breast lesions without a well-circumscribed margins are almost 17x more likley to indicate malignant breast cancer. Breast sonograms showing a heterogeneous echo texture are about 8x more likely to be breast cancer. The ‘incompressibility’ of a breast lesion on ultrasound would tend to be almost 9x more likely to be malignant.
Ultrasound interpretations are not always straight forward
Not all suspicious breast lesions will be straightforward in their ultrasound appearance and diagnosis. In some cases the findings are still inconclusive, with a recommendation for short interval follow-up, or biopsy. But, one of the reasons to use ultrasound in the first place is because there is a high suspicion of a benign mass to begin with, and the use of ultrasound is mostly to confirm the cystic nature of the lesion. For example, ultrasound can not always reliably confirm the diagnosis of a breast abscess.
- Stavros T, Thickman D, Rapp C, Dennis M, Parker S, Sisney G. Solid Breast Nodules: use of sonography to distinguish between benign and malignant lesions. Radiology 1995; 196:123-13.
- Paulinelli, RR., Freitas-Junior, R., Moreira, MAR., de Moraes, VA., Bernardes-Junerio, JRM., Vidal, CdSR., Ruiz, AN., Lucato, MT. Risk of Malignancy in Solid Breast Nodules According to Their Sonographic Features. J Ultrasound Med 24:635-641
- Yang WT, Whitman GJ, Yuen EH, Tse GM, Stelling CB.Yang WT, Whitman GJ, Yuen EH, Tse GM, Stelling CB. AJR Am J Roentgenol.(Feb. 2001) 176(2):413-6.
- Hong AS, Rosen EL, Soo MS, Baker JA.BI-RADS for sonography: positive and negative predictive values of sonographic features. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (Apr. 2005) 184(4):1260-5.
- Raza, S., Goldkamp, AL., Chikarmane, SA., Birdwell, RL., US of Breast Masses Categorized as BI-RADS 3, 4, and 5: Pictorial Review of Factors Influencing Clinical Management RadioGraphics,( September , 2010); 30(5): 1199 – 1213.
- Mesurolle B, Kadoch L, El-Khoury M, Lisbona A, Dendukuri N, Foulkes WD. Sonographic features of breast carcinoma presenting as masses in BRCA gene mutation carriers. J Ultrasound Med.( June.2007) ;26(6):817-24.
- Chiou, SY., Chou, YH., Chiou, HJ., Wang, HK., Tiu, CM.,Teseng, LM., Change, CY., Sonographic features of nonpalpable breast cancer: A study based on ultrasound-guided wire-localized surgical biopsies. Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology, (Sept. 2006)Volume 32, Issue 9, Pages 1299-1306.
- Paulinelli RR, Freitas-Júnior R, Moreira MA, Moraes VA, Bernardes-Júnior JR, Vidal Cda S, Ruiz AN, Lucato MT. Risk of malignancy in solid breast nodules according to their sonographic features. J Ultrasound Med. (May 2005) 24(5):635-41.
- Baek SE, Kim MJ, Kim EK, Youk JH, Lee HJ, Son EJ.Effect of clinical information on diagnostic performance in breast sonography. J Ultrasound Med. (Oct. 2009) 28(10):1349-56.
- Hazard HW, Hansen NM Image-guided procedures for breast masses. Adv Surg.( 2007);41:257-272
- Pruthi S. Detection and evaluation of a palpable breast mass. Mayo Clin Proc. 2001;76(6):641-647.
- Yap MH, Edirisinghe E, Gale A, Bez H. Processed images in human perception: A case study in ultrasound breast imaging. Eur J Radiol.( 2009)
- Guray M, Sahin AA. Benign breast diseases: classification, diagnosis, and management. Oncologist. 2006;11:435-449.
- ACR Standard for the Performance of Breast Ultrasound Examination, 2000-2001 ACR Standards. Reston, Va: American College of Radiology; 389-392.
- Skaane P, Engedal K. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma. AJR Am J Roentgenol. (1998);170:109-114.
- Ohlinger R, Klein GM, Köhler G.Ultrasound of the breast – value of sonographic criteria for the differential diagnosis of solid lesions. Ultraschall Med. (Feb.2004) 25(1):48-53.
Back to breast cancer staging list.