Breast Cancer - Moose and Doc

A breast cancer explanations website

 

By Dr. Halls

Conventional Mammography: References

 

Back to Conventional Mammography

 

References for Conventional Mammography

 

  • Brem RF, Baum J, Lechner M, Kaplan S, Souders S, Naul LG, Hoffmeister J.(2003) Improvement in sensitivity of screening mammography with computer-aided detection: a multiinstitutional trial. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003 Sep;181(3):687-93. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12933460
  • Fletcher SW, Elmore JG. (2003) Clinical practice: mammographic screening for breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;348 :1672 –1680 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3157308/
  • Freer TW, Ulissey MJ. (2001) Screening mammography with computer-aided detection: prospective study of 12,860 patients in a community breast center. Radiology (2001);220: 781–786. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11526282
  • Hendrick RE, Pisano ED, Averbukh A, Moran C, Berns EA, Yaffe MJ, Herman B, Acharyya S, Gatsonis C. (2010) Comparison of Acquisition Parameters and Breast Dose in Digital Mammography and Screen-film Mammography in the American College of Radiology Imaging Network Digital Mammographic Imaging Screening Trial. Am J Roentgenol. 2010;194(2):362-369 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20093597
  • Helme S, Perry N, Mokbel K. (2006) Screening mammography in women aged 40-49: is it time to change? Int Semin Surg Oncol. 2006 Feb 6;3:4. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC1431548/
  • Kim SJ, Moon WK, Cho N, Cha JH, Kim SM, Im JG. (2006) Computer-aided detection in digital mammography: comparison of craniocaudal, mediolateral oblique, and mediolateral views. Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):695-701. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114620
  • Ko JM, Nicholas MJ, Mendel JB, Slanetz PJ. (2006) Prospective assessment of computer-aided detection in interpretation of screening mammography. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2006 Dec;187(6):1483-91.
    https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17114541
  • Kreager JA, Kornguth PJ. (1994) Mammography for screening high-risk patients for cancer: value of including a lateral projection. AJR Am J Roentgenol (1994);162:295–297. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8310913
  • Lewin JM, Hendrick RE, D’Orsi CJ. (et al). (2001) Comparison of full-field digital mammography to screen-film mammography for cancer detection: results of 4,945 paired examinations. Radiology 2001; 218:873–880 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11230669
  • Shapiro S, Venet W, Strax P, Venet L, Roeser R. (1982) Ten- to fourteen-year effect of screening on breast cancer mortality. J Natl Cancer Inst 1982; 69:349–355 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6955542
  • Sickles EA, Weber WN, Galvin HB, Ominsky SH, Sollitto RA. (1986) Baseline screening mammography: one vs two views per breast. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1986 Dec;147(6):1149-53. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3490749
  • Svahn T, Andersson I, Chakraborty D, Svensson S, Ikeda D, Förnvik D, Mattsson S, Tingberg A, Zackrisson S. (2010) The diagnostic accuracy of dual-view digital mammography, single-view breast tomosynthesis and a dual-view combination of breast tomosynthesis and digital mammography in a free-response observer performance study.Radiat Prot Dosimetry. (2010 Apr-May) ;139(1-3):113-7. Epub 2010 Mar 12. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2911156/
  • Tabár L, Fragerberg CJ, Gad A, (et al). (1985) Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography: randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet 1985; 1:829–832 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2858707
  • Vedantham S, Karellas A, Suryanarayanan S. (et al). (2000) Full breast digital mammography with an amorphous silicon-based flat panel detector: physical characteristics of a clinical prototype. Med Phys 2000; 27:558–567 https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10757607

 

Back to Conventional Mammography