Triple Negative Breast Cancer: Section 6.d.
CONTENTS:
6.10 What is ‘Triple Negative Breast Cancer’ (TNBC)?
6.11 Molecular Techniques in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Forward to section 7A on breast cancer staging. Back to 6C about ER, PR and HER2
6.10 What is ‘Triple Negative Breast Cancer’ (TNBC)?
Immunohistochemical studies and gene expression profiling have identified subgroups of breast cancer, which link to breast cancer prognosis. One subgroup associated with poor outcome lacks estrogen receptors (ER), progesterone receptors (PR) and Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) expression. So, triple negative breast cancers (TNBC) is ER-, PR- and HER2-.
Clinical trials are in progress regarding the management of ER, PR, HER2 ‘triple negative cancers’. So, there is always hope for a better prognosis and treatment.
Triple Negative Breast Cancer and Gene Expression
Triple Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) shares morphological and genetic abnormalities with basal-like breast cancer (BLBC); these are types of breast cancer defined by gene-expression profiling.
What is gene expression profiling?
For any breast cancer to develop, it is the genes within the breast cancer cells that determine the rate of cell growth and mutation. Gene expression profile testing is a process of molecular biology that examines thousands of
TNBC and BLBC tumors are heterogeneous and some overlap occurs. The type of breast cancer found in BRCA mutation carriers are also frequently triple negative and basal-like.
More about Triple Negative Breast Cancer
TNBC and BLBC are found most often in younger women, especially African-American women; they tend to be aggressive, high-grade and they develop into metastatic breast cancer earlier. It has been suggested that the use of oral contraceptives in younger women is one of the risk factors for triple negative breast cancer.
These breast tumors respond to conventional chemotherapy but relapse more frequently than hormone receptor-positive, ‘luminal’ subtypes, and they have a poorer prognosis.
A lot of patients with TNBC and BLBC relapse and so specialists are investigating new systemic treatments. Hormonal therapy and HER2-targeted agents are ineffective in treating these cancers.
6.11 Molecular Techniques in Breast Cancer Diagnosis
Studies on breast cancer using gene expression analysis have identified several distinct breast cancer subtypes that differ markedly in prognosis. The major clusters are those relating to estrogen receptor (ER) expression (the ‘luminal’ cluster), HER2 expression, proliferation, and the unique cluster of genes, the ‘basal cluster.’ As scientists study the genomic data from tissue specimens, they are also identifying more breast cancer subtypes.
Pathologists and molecular biologists are working together to examine whether refinements to improve the prognostic and predictive power of the tissue-based classifications of breast cancer, are possible. This may improve both treatment and outcome.
Below is a summary of current molecular techniques:-
- Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH): determines the positions of particular genes. FISH identifies chromosomal abnormalities and maps genes.
- Polymerase chain reaction (PCR): is a method of making many copies of particular DNA sequences of relevance to the tissue diagnosis.
- ‘Real-time’ PCR or ‘quantitative’ PCR: is a method of measuring how many copies of a particular DNA sequence are present.
- Reverse-transcriptase polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR): is a method of making several copies of a specific RNA sequence.
- Southern blot hybridization: detects specific DNA fragments.
- Western blot hybridization: identifies and analyzes proteins or peptides.
Is there a future for Immunohistochemistry?
In the future, immunohistochemistry may be replaced as the main method for assessing predictive markers in all stages of cancer, including early-stage breast cancer. For example, the role of IHC in HER2 testing could be replaced by frontline FISH; real-time (quantitative) PCR may be used to assess gene expression levels for ER and HER2.
Commercially available assays that analyze the expression of a range of genes are now available. If molecular assays can become automated on the scale of biochemical assays and if the cost per test becomes competitive, the use of IHC could diminish and with it, the issues around quantification.
The analysis of gene expression profiles has begun to develop new classification systems. Clinical studies by Rouzier and colleagues in 2005 have identified molecular classes of breast cancer (luminal, HER2-enriched, basal-like and normal-like) that may have prognostic value and be predictive of the response to chemotherapy therapy, including neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Advances in Molecular Classifications
New advances in molecular (gene-based)classification are developing because, as opposed to the past when only fresh or frozen breast
As an example, a gene expression assay on FFPE breast tissue using 50 genes (PAM50) is based on quantitative, real-time, reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR) that identifies major molecular subtypes of breast cancer and generates ‘risk-of-relapse’ scores. (Nielsen et al., 2010; Ellis et al., 2011).
Meanwhile, the use of light microscopy-based techniques such as immunohistochemistry (IHC) continue to refine the diagnostic Pathology process for most patients. The panelists of the last St. Gallen Consensus have endorsed the use of immunohistochemical assays to identify breast cancer subtypes and to inform the choice of the systemic treatments (Goldhirsch et al., 2011).
Triple negative breast cancer treatment may include neoadjuvant chemotherapy (this is having chemotherapy treatment before any surgery). Triple negative breast cancer does tend to metastasize to other sites so lymph nodes may need to be biopsied or excised. Parp inhibitors may be effective in the treatment of Triple negative breast cancer. These are drugs that block cell enzymes and may be particularly effective in the treatment of BRCA-related cancers. Radiation therapy is also an effective treatment after surgery in early-stage triple negative breast cancer.
For more information on triple-negative breast cancer treatment options click HERE
References
Abd El-Rehim, D.M., Pinder, S.E., Paish, C.E., et al. (2004). Expression of luminal and basal cytokeratins in human breast carcinoma. J Pathol. 203, 661–671. (Retrieved November 19th 2014): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15141381
Acs, G., Lawton, T.J., Rebbeck, T.R., Livolsi, V.A., Zhang, P.J. (2001). Differential expression of E-cadherin in lobular and ductal neoplasms of the breast and its biologic and diagnostic implications. Am J Clin Pathol. 115, 85–98. (Retrieved November 19th 2014): https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11190811
The rest of the references for this section 6D are on this page.
Patient Information
BREASTCANCER ORG. Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (Retrieved January 7th 2014): http://www.breastcancer.org/symptoms/diagnosis/trip_neg
International Association of Research on Cancer (IARC). Breast Cancer. (Retrieved November 21st 2014): https://www.iarc.fr/cards_page/iarc-research/
Forward to section 7A on breast cancer staging. Back to 6C about ER, PR and HER2