Breast microcalcifications on mammogram
Indications of breast cancer malignancy
Breast calcifications, (small calcium deposits in breast soft tissue), are extremely common in women and almost always associated with a benign breast condition unrelated to cancer.
They appears as white dots on a mammogram, and are not a cause of concern.
Microcalcifications are also basically calcium deposits, but they are much smaller and much less common. Microcalcification tends to be the result of a genetic mutations somewhere in the breast tissue, but they can still be due to other conditions. The size, distribution, form, and density of microcalcifications are thought to give clues as to the potentially malignant nature of their origin.
We just want to let you know that this page is a bit old. There is a new page on microcalcification information by clicking here.
There is also this old page on microcalcifications, also still worth looking at actually.
Classifications of microcalcifications according to form, size, density, and distribution.
In terms of Form, microcalcifications come in many shapes. They can be round, linear, coarse, granular (fine), monomorphic (all the same basic shape), or pleomorphic (many different shapes), or clustered.
In Size, microcalfications are described as either large or small, or when in clusters whether the sizes of microcalcifications are homogeneous or not.
The Density of microcalcifications may be high, low, or variable. And if in a cluster, the homogeneous or non-homogeneous nature of the density is noted.
The Distribution refers to the overall placements of the microcalcifications within the breast image. Microcalfications can be in single clusters or multifocal, unilateral or bilateral, diffuse, segmental, linear, or regional.
Best indicators for the evaluation of microcalcifications: benign, suspicious, malignant.
So many different factors are taken into acount when deciding if a potential lesion is malignant or not. Microcalcifications are usually considered a very early screening indicator which may or may not be accompanied by suspicious histological findings, when requested. When evaluating microcalcifications, if there are combinations of findings that tend to lead to the same outcome (benign or malignant), it is generally true that those predictions carry even more weight.
It can be said that as a general rule, when the microcalcifications are distributed in diffuse or bilateral arrangements in the acini, or with a round or punctuate shape, or scattered in dense breast tissue, the situation is usually benign.
However, if the microcalcifications are in a branching or linear pattern and with irregular borders, or with variable density, or distributed in a segmental or haphazard way, this is highly suspicious of ductal carcinoma in situ, or malignancy in other words.
Sometimes the nature of microcalcifications can only be described as ‘suspicious‘ requiring a biopsy to find out more predictive information. When the distribution is linear and the form of the microcalcifications are either round, oval, punctuate, or amorphous, this is suspicious. A variable density of distributions (closely packed over here, widely spaced over there) is also considered to be suspicious but not definitive.
Benign, not related to breast cancer
Calcifications are common in the breast, and regardless of the cause they will appear on the mammogram. An experienced radiologist can quickly tell the difference from benign calcifications and those associated with breast carcinoma, however.
Epidermal and dermal (outer and inner skin layers) breast calcifications can take the form of moles with crevices. Also, sweat glands often develop round or oval, lucent-centered calcifications. Dermal breast calcifications are very common.
Vascular calcifications (emanating from blood vessels) may also develop in the breast. Typically they are linear, and when they originate in arteries they appear in a parallel ‘tram track’-like formation. In very rare instances, vascular calcifications can arise from venous (in the veins) calcification in Mondor’s disease.
Dystrophic calcifications are brownish, and are essentially ‘scars’ or rather calcium deposits accumlating in scar tissue. They tend to be dense, coarse, large, and irrebularly shaped, and develop in stromal tissues. (supporting, fibrous tissues). Dystrophic calcifications in the breast can result from many sources, including hematoma, fibrooadenoma, abscess, or may form in the fibrous capsules around implants. They can also appear post-surgery or post-radiation, or due to fat necrosis.
Benign Ductal calcifications
Sometimes large, diffuse, bilateral, and ‘rod-like‘ calcifications can appear in breast ducts, completely unrelated to cancer, which are usually the result of a secretory disease. These would include periductal mastitis, or plasma cell mastitis. (Plasma cell mastitis is misnamed, and has nothing to do with plasma cells; it is really just inflammation following a bacterial infection.)
Benign lobular calcifications
Lobular carcinoma is much less common than ductal carcinoma to begin with, so any curious calcification in the breast lobules is very unlikely to be something serious. Benign lobular calcifications commonly appear round in shape, with a relatively high density. They typically have well-defined or pearl-like contours, and have smooth borders. If the lumen of acini are small, they often appear punctate (with little spots on them).
Sometimes benign lobular calcifications that are ‘egg‘ shaped or rim-like develop in oil cysts, and teacup or meniscus-like shapes can develop in microcysts. The shape of lobular calcification depends to a certain extent upon the ‘view‘ or angle of the X-ray. In a CC (Cranio-Caudal) view the lobular calcifications often appear round and smudgy, and scattered bilaterally.
Surgical sutures and parasites can be mistaken for breast calcifications
It’s hard to believe, but occasionally surgical sutures (stiches) are mistaken for breast calcifications. This sometimes happens with inexperienced radiologists, or in a team setting where different individuals perform the clinical exam and the mammogram, but fail to communicate.
Parasites are so uncommon in western, industrialized nations that clinicians sometimes fail to consider them as a possibility, but in parts of Asia and Africa, they are not at all uncommon. Breast parasites might include filariasis, onechocerciasis, and loiasis (Loa Loa). Trichinosis is another nasty parasite that can sometimes take hold in the pectoral muscle.
So, what may appear to be sinuous and linear calcifications are actually very small ‘worms‘. Typically, parasitic infections are treated with medications that attack the eggs, so eventually the parasites die off. This can take several weeks, however.
Punctate means a tiny dot, like the tap of a sewing needle onto the surface of a sheet of paper. Whether puncture or punctuation help you remember, it means tiny dot.
Punctate calcification or microcalcification is a good benign thing. Even a cluster of punctate calcifications would be benign.
- Balleyguier V, Vanel D, Athanasiou A, Mathieu MC, Sigal R. Breast Radiological Cases: Training with BI-RADS Classification. European Journal of Radiology 54 (2005) 97-106.
- Radi M. J. Calcium oxalate crystals in breast biopsies. Arch. Pathol. Lab Med., 113: 1367-1369, 1989
- Johnson J. M., Dalton R. R., Wester S. M., Landercasper J., Lambert P. J. Histological correlation of microcalcifications in breast biopsy specimens. Arch. Surg., 134: 712-716, 1999
- Zgheib MH, Buchbinder SS, Abi Rafeh N, Elya M, Raia C, Ahern K, Smith MC, Costantino T, Flory MJ, Lafferty JC, Castellanos MR.Breast arterial calcifications on mammograms do not predict coronary heart disease at coronary angiography. Radiology. 2010 Feb;254(2):367-73.
- Kataoka M, Warren R, Luben R, Camus J, Denton E, Sala E, Day N, Khaw KT. How predictive is breast arterial calcification of cardiovascular disease and risk factors when found at screening mammography? AJR Am J Roentgenol. (July 2006)187(1):73-80.
- Berg WA, Arnoldus CL, Teferra E, Bhargavan M. Biopsy of amorphous breast calcifications: pathologic outcome and yield at stereotactic biopsy. Radiology. ( Nov. 2001) 221(2):495-503.
- Senetta, R., Companino, PP., Mariscotti, G., Garberoglio, S. Daniele, L., Pennecchi, F., Macri, L., Bosco, M., Gandini, G., Sapino, A. Columnar cell lesions associated with breast calcifications on vacuum-assisted core biopsies: clinical, radiographic, and histological correlations. Modern Pathology (2009) 22, 762–769
- Rogers, KD., Baker, R., Stone, N., Breast calcification: the ‘Cinderella’ breast element? Breast Cancer Research 2010, 12(Suppl 1):P36
- Thomas DB, Whitehead J, Dorse C, Threatt BA, Gilbert FI Jr, Present AJ, Carlile T. Mammographic calcifications and risk of subsequent breast cancer. J Natl Cancer Inst.(Feb. 1993) 85(3):230-5.
- Nalawade YV. Evaluation of breast calcifications. Indian J Radiol Imaging (2009);19:282-6.
- Connors, AM., Svensson, WE., Shousha, S., Idiopathic Benign Breast Calcification. The Breast Journal (July 2004)Volume 10, Issue 4, pages 355–358.